Check out our short survey
cap signal base frequency table and weigth matrix
(from Bucher 1990, J. Mol. Biol. 212, 563-578, Table 4)
-3 |
-2 |
-1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
# A |
49 |
0 |
288 |
26 |
77 |
67 |
45 |
50 |
# C |
48 |
303 |
0 |
81 |
95 |
118 |
85 |
96 |
# G |
69 |
0 |
0 |
116 |
0 |
46 |
73 |
56 |
# T |
137 |
0 |
15 |
80 |
131 |
72 |
100 |
101 |
|
W(A) |
-1.14 |
-5.26 |
0.00 |
-1.51 |
-0.65 |
-0.55 |
-0.91 |
-0.82 |
W(C) |
-1.16 |
0.00 |
-5.21 |
-0.41 |
-0.45 |
0.00 |
-0.29 |
-0.18 |
W(G) |
-0.75 |
-5.26 |
-5.21 |
0.00 |
-4.56 |
-0.86 |
-0.38 |
-0.65 |
W(T) |
0.00 |
-5.26 |
-2.74 |
-0.29 |
0.00 |
-0.36 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Consensus |
t/g |
C |
A/t |
g/t/c |
T/c/a |
c/t |
t/c/g |
t/c |
|
Preferred region: Position 0 between 1 and
+5 relative to transcription start site. |
Optimizid cut-off value: -3.75 (81.4%) |
Last update October 2019